The Digital Public Interest Collective and the Gender, Equity, Media, and Society (GEMS) Research Lab will be hosting 2 collaborative workshops focused on building bystander intervention capacity in digital environments in November, 2026.
Friday , November 6, 2026
9:00 am - 4:30 pm EST In person: Western University
Thursday, November 26, 2026
11:00 am - 2:00 pm EST Online
The first session is a one-day, in-person collaborative workshop that will bring together community practitioners, advocates, educators, and academic researchers to co-develop practical, evidence-informed toolkit resources that support safer online communities across Canada via bystander intervention strategies.
The second session will take place online and will provide participants with an opportunity to review, discuss, and provide feedback on prototype toolkit materials developed through the first workshop. This shorter follow-up session will support collaborative refinement of the resources and help ensure the toolkits are practical, accessible, and responsive to community needs.
The workshop series will include presentations, facilitated discussions, and collaborative design activities. The resulting resources will be made openly available through Pressbooks and hosted on the Digital Public Interest Collective website for use by community organizations, educators, EDI offices, HR professionals, and anti-violence advocates across Canada.
Email mandy.2lau @ royalroads dot ca to connect!
Chen, Y., Mendes, K., Gosse, C., Hodson, J., & Veletsianos (2025)
This article examines the current state of GBV prevention training in Canada through an analysis of 81 GBV education programs provided by antiviolence organizations and universities. We identified notable gaps in topics relating to technology-facilitated violence and abuse in programs targeting men and in the provision of bystander intervention training. Each of these areas represents important, but as yet unrealized, opportunities in violence prevention.
Morales, E., Hodson, J., Chen, Y., Mendes, K., Veletsianos, G., & Gosse, C. (2025)
This study investigates how political affiliation influences perceptions of GBTFVA among young Canadian men. To explore this, we draw on a survey of 1297 young Canadian men who align themselves with ideological affiliations across the political spectrum. Overall, our results show that political ideologies matter when understanding who enacts and sustains GBTFVA, as they significantly shape attitudes toward gender-based violence in digital spaces. Moreover, while we note that conservative participants displayed higher acceptance of GBTFVA myths than their liberal counterparts, findings show that these harmful narratives are endorsed in different yet meaningful ways throughout all ideological affiliations. Furthermore, we found that one myth—It wasn’t really gender-based online abuse—is similarly endorsed across all political affiliations, thus highlighting the scope of these narratives that diminish the experience of targets across political discourses.
Morales, E., Hodson, J., Chen, Y., Gosse, C., Mendes, K., & Veletsianos, G. (2024)
Drawing on the literature on rape myths, this paper explores the prevalence of seven gender-based online violence myths among Canadian men. To achieve this, we adapted the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance (IRMA) (Payne et al., in J Research in Personality 33:27–68, 1999) to assess GBTFVA, and surveyed 1,297 Canadian men between 18 and 30 years old on their GBTFVA beliefs. Our results show that GBTFVA myths and cultural narratives are prevalent across participants, though endorsement levels vary. Four myths were more strongly endorsed: It Wasn’t Really Gender-Based Online Abuse, He Didn’t Mean To, Gender-Based Online Abuse Is a Deviant Event, and She Lied. Overall, these findings help to name and thus begin to address the narratives that sustain and perpetuate gender-based online violence.
To support our toolkit-building, our team has compiled a list of relevant resources.
Feel free to suggest any helpful additions!